We’ve elevated our social support system to the point that complete and
total morons are able to survive not only to breeding age, but to multi-decade
voting age.
Hillary barely worked, too....I believe the CLintons had never owned a home until they were gazillionares coming out of the White House...you know, the time Hillary said they were broke?
U.S. High Court Rejects Republicans on North Carolina Voting Map
The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for a new congressional voting map in North Carolina this year, rejecting a Republican bid to reinstate district lines thrown out by a lower court.
The order was one of the high court’s first since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. It came without published dissent . A three-judge panel said Feb. 5 that the original map, drawn by the state’s Republican-controlled legislature, unconstitutionally packed too many black voters into two overwhelmingly Democratic districts. The panel gave the state until Feb. 19 to put a new map in place.
In asking the Supreme Court to block the lower-court order, North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory, a Republican, said it would disrupt the scheduled March 15 congressional and presidential primaries. McCrory said election officials had already distributed thousands of absentee ballots and hundreds of those ballots had been returned with votes.
Democrats now hold just three of North Carolina’s 13 U.S. House districts, including seats occupied by Representatives G.K. Butterfield and Alma Adams, both of whom are black.
Probably. Now what is YOUR understanding of the phenomenon they're calling "SUPER DELEGATES," Kid? Apparently, this fairly recent invention of the ever-scheming De-MOCK-rats (;-) is designed to THWART The Will of the People by cleverly undermining Majority Rule. I think the country ought to discuss, dissect, and hopefully DEFEAT this machination by having it declared unconstitutional.
What's "constitutional" these days, you ask? Apparently anything a shitting president and the Supreme Cunt want to SAY it is. The definition of constitutionality has become as fluid as the blood seeping from a fresh cutlass wound on the body politic.
Strong language? Yes, Kid, but APT considering the corrupt conditions under which we are now forced to labor. Once in a great while "strong language" is needed, if only to wake readers up, and to pay attention. I've seen a good deal of four letter words used here, and thought what I said would not offend the standards of the house. Sorry, if I did. I don't use vulgarity very often, as you may have noticed.
As for the Electoral College, I am an "originalist," and bow always to the superior wisdom and supreme intelligence of our Founding Fathers. Its purpose was to make sure that sparsely populated regions, often rich in natural resources, received more or less equal representation as the cities and their surrounding areas where population density is very high. Without the Electoral College the most densely populated regions would be in COMPLETE control. Considering who and what urban populations are today, we should all be grateful for the electoral college.
This "super delegate" thing has only been around since 1984. It appears to be an invention of the DemonRats, obviously designed to enable them to manipulate their way to unearned victories with greater ease and speed.
FT, 4 letter words go on here and are Ok with me as most of them are just steam release with no particular target (In fact that's one reason I started this blog - at the request of one named RNGRMOM82 who wanted to swear and who is no longer with us), but the C word is directed at and particularly offensive to women and I find it unacceptable for that reason.
Moving on. What I'm specifically thinking is say if California and most other states - if the popular vote is blue or red by a majority of one single vote, all the states reps vote that direction. Imagine if every rep in California had to vote to Represent Their specific district. Dem vermin would never win the white house again.
With a Republican president, along with solid GOP majorities in both the Senate and the House, we should be able to end the welfare state. Just cut off all checks to the morons, and stand back and see what happens.
My prediction: great wailing and gnashing of teeth from the left. Predictions from these pinkoes of the masses of the downtrodden thrown into the mean streets to suffer and perish. The left will warn of such mass starvation and suffering, we will have to stack up the dead bodies of those cut off from their means of support, much like cord wood.
My prediction of what happens to those who no longer get checks for nothing: they will get jobs.
I'd love to see this play out, see who's right and who's wrong.
Fredd, Some will get jobs. I believe the vast majority of them are unemployable. Plus 40% of working age people are unemployed right now. Wouldn't that make the UE rate 40$ if it were reported honestly.
So, a bunch of them would simply go out and steal what they need. Most like stores, until the stores employed enough security, then home invasion.
I say deport them instead.
Better yet, let the libtards have the Northern states they need based on their population, and we will take the rest, put up solid border controls, and don't calls us we'll calls you (not).
Nah, rampant crime sprees will only end in lots of dead looter bodies stacked up like cord wood. Lowlifes are usually pretty crafty folk: they will quickly see that home invasions don't pay off on average. They will get jobs. One of us is right, and one of us is wrong, Kid.
I'd love to find out which is which. As for somebody invading MY home, go ahead. Make my day. A .357 Magnum loaded with hollow points awaits the scumbag who tries this kind of foolishness.
Fredd, I had one of those but I prefer my Springfield 16 +1 :) for really close quarters and the semi-Auto shotgun when there is a little distance. So as to avoid bullets going through several neighbors houses :)
DETROIT--again I bring it up- one of the first to give the $$$ of working folks to non working "victims" >>> and extra $$$ to those who BREED --have babies out of wedlock (where - oh -where are the "fathers" SARC)
Will we ever learn to stop "HELPING" --and we in the US do it all over the world--
Washington stated in his farewell address "..stay out of the affairs of Europe." my take--today he would say--"stay out of the affairs of the rest of the world and watch out for the US Republic FIRST!" C-CS
We can't keep up the cycle of paying children to have children who scam the system by voting more than once. We can't keep letting in illegal immigrants who expect benefits and the right to vote for candidates who promise more free stuff. We can't survive these toxic policies.
Cube, yes, it has become a way of life since the mid-60's, and is only going exponential. They're like the boat people now. A girl has 3 girls for the sole purpose of getting checks from the government, who each have 3 girls.....
And These kids get zero education because their animals and the schools have zero ability to discipline them, and they fester in zero opportunity, drug and crime infested environments, where frankly, if they don't become gang bangers themselves they probably die on the street. The dems do nothing but pour water and fertilizer on this situation and the repubs are afraid to do anything about it for fear of being called even moreso racisss.
It will destroy this country.
Then obama and holder and crew come along and incite them into perpetrating violence and hatred on All white people, not just the assholes and we get to read about how 3 black punks beat the crap out of some white person every day in the news.
I'm up to here. I will go out of my way to not help the black community.
Cube, I think we're at the breaking point. We have no opposition party, and we have 2 generations at least (Plus the stupid older people) who believe socialism is the way to go when there isn't a single successful example to cite.
We may have crossed the breaking point. Many believe we have as they went silent when the POS enemy of the USA was re-elected in 2012.
OMGosh, Kid. Perfectly true.
ReplyDeleteAdrienne, Thanks Much! (I like to keep it short.)
DeleteMulti-decade senatorial presidential candidate age.
ReplyDeleteEd, I think I'm getting it but not sure. If you';e saying morons can become president then Hell Yea.. :)
DeleteSanders in particular. Never held a job, always living on the government.
DeleteOh. Just noticed the Idiocracy link. Yep
DeleteHillary barely worked, too....I believe the CLintons had never owned a home until they were gazillionares coming out of the White House...you know, the time Hillary said they were broke?
DeleteI'm not that familiar with that part of it. Yea dead broke if you don't count the billions they stole.
DeleteIMPORTANT NEWSFLASH AN OMINOUS SIGN:
ReplyDeleteU.S. High Court Rejects Republicans on North Carolina Voting Map
The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for a new congressional voting map in North Carolina this year, rejecting a Republican bid to reinstate district lines thrown out by a lower court.
The order was one of the high court’s first since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. It came without published dissent
.
A three-judge panel said Feb. 5 that the original map, drawn by the state’s Republican-controlled legislature, unconstitutionally packed too many black voters into two overwhelmingly Democratic districts. The panel gave the state until Feb. 19 to put a new map in place.
In asking the Supreme Court to block the lower-court order, North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory, a Republican, said it would disrupt the scheduled March 15 congressional and presidential primaries. McCrory said election officials had already distributed thousands of absentee ballots and hundreds of those ballots had been returned with votes.
Democrats now hold just three of North Carolina’s 13 U.S. House districts, including seats occupied by Representatives G.K. Butterfield and Alma Adams, both of whom are black.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-02-20/u-s-high-court-rejects-republicans-on-north-carolina-voting-map
FT, Imagine if electoral votes had to go the direction of their specific districts. Democrats would never win another national election.
DeleteProbably. Now what is YOUR understanding of the phenomenon they're calling "SUPER DELEGATES," Kid? Apparently, this fairly recent invention of the ever-scheming De-MOCK-rats (;-) is designed to THWART The Will of the People by cleverly undermining Majority Rule. I think the country ought to discuss, dissect, and hopefully DEFEAT this machination by having it declared unconstitutional.
DeleteWhat's "constitutional" these days, you ask? Apparently anything a shitting president and the Supreme Cunt want to SAY it is. The definition of constitutionality has become as fluid as the blood seeping from a fresh cutlass wound on the body politic.
FT, That's some strong language, I hope you'll not use the C word and the like.
DeleteIt hasn't been majority rule as long as the electoral college has existed. Nixon actually won the popular vote over JFK.
Strong language? Yes, Kid, but APT considering the corrupt conditions under which we are now forced to labor. Once in a great while "strong language" is needed, if only to wake readers up, and to pay attention. I've seen a good deal of four letter words used here, and thought what I said would not offend the standards of the house. Sorry, if I did. I don't use vulgarity very often, as you may have noticed.
DeleteAs for the Electoral College, I am an "originalist," and bow always to the superior wisdom and supreme intelligence of our Founding Fathers. Its purpose was to make sure that sparsely populated regions, often rich in natural resources, received more or less equal representation as the cities and their surrounding areas where population density is very high. Without the Electoral College the most densely populated regions would be in COMPLETE control. Considering who and what urban populations are today, we should all be grateful for the electoral college.
This "super delegate" thing has only been around since 1984. It appears to be an invention of the DemonRats, obviously designed to enable them to manipulate their way to unearned victories with greater ease and speed.
FT, 4 letter words go on here and are Ok with me as most of them are just steam release with no particular target (In fact that's one reason I started this blog - at the request of one named RNGRMOM82 who wanted to swear and who is no longer with us), but the C word is directed at and particularly offensive to women and I find it unacceptable for that reason.
DeleteMoving on. What I'm specifically thinking is say if California and most other states - if the popular vote is blue or red by a majority of one single vote, all the states reps vote that direction. Imagine if every rep in California had to vote to Represent Their specific district. Dem vermin would never win the white house again.
With a Republican president, along with solid GOP majorities in both the Senate and the House, we should be able to end the welfare state. Just cut off all checks to the morons, and stand back and see what happens.
ReplyDeleteMy prediction: great wailing and gnashing of teeth from the left. Predictions from these pinkoes of the masses of the downtrodden thrown into the mean streets to suffer and perish. The left will warn of such mass starvation and suffering, we will have to stack up the dead bodies of those cut off from their means of support, much like cord wood.
My prediction of what happens to those who no longer get checks for nothing: they will get jobs.
I'd love to see this play out, see who's right and who's wrong.
Fredd, Some will get jobs. I believe the vast majority of them are unemployable. Plus 40% of working age people are unemployed right now. Wouldn't that make the UE rate 40$ if it were reported honestly.
ReplyDeleteSo, a bunch of them would simply go out and steal what they need. Most like stores, until the stores employed enough security, then home invasion.
I say deport them instead.
Better yet, let the libtards have the Northern states they need based on their population, and we will take the rest, put up solid border controls, and don't calls us we'll calls you (not).
Nah, rampant crime sprees will only end in lots of dead looter bodies stacked up like cord wood. Lowlifes are usually pretty crafty folk: they will quickly see that home invasions don't pay off on average. They will get jobs. One of us is right, and one of us is wrong, Kid.
DeleteI'd love to find out which is which. As for somebody invading MY home, go ahead. Make my day. A .357 Magnum loaded with hollow points awaits the scumbag who tries this kind of foolishness.
Fredd, I had one of those but I prefer my Springfield 16 +1 :) for really close quarters and the semi-Auto shotgun when there is a little distance. So as to avoid bullets going through several neighbors houses :)
DeleteI had a 357 and nothing would stop those slugs.
Who was it who said that people who have no skin in the game shouldn't be able to vote?
ReplyDeleteZ, Probably most people with skin in the game.
DeleteOnce again, you have proven the truth of the old axiom, "brevity (blah, blah, blah) wit." And managed to hurl me back into depression...
ReplyDeleteNever fear; Hillary's here
DeleteWaiting in the wings
To bring you good cheer.
};-)>
DETROIT--again I bring it up- one of the first to give the $$$ of working folks to non working "victims" >>>
Deleteand extra $$$ to those who BREED --have babies out of wedlock (where - oh -where are the "fathers" SARC)
Will we ever learn to stop "HELPING" --and we in the US do it all over the world--
Washington stated in his farewell address "..stay out of the affairs of Europe." my take--today he would say--"stay out of the affairs of the rest of the world and watch out for the US Republic FIRST!"
C-CS
C-CS As far as the baby machines - this democrat voter expansion program is by design of course, created by LBJ and fellow rodents.
DeleteDaBlade, You'll be ship shape in no time.
DeleteWe can't keep up the cycle of paying children to have children who scam the system by voting more than once. We can't keep letting in illegal immigrants who expect benefits and the right to vote for candidates who promise more free stuff. We can't survive these toxic policies.
ReplyDeleteCube, yes, it has become a way of life since the mid-60's, and is only going exponential. They're like the boat people now. A girl has 3 girls for the sole purpose of getting checks from the government, who each have 3 girls.....
DeleteAnd These kids get zero education because their animals and the schools have zero ability to discipline them, and they fester in zero opportunity, drug and crime infested environments, where frankly, if they don't become gang bangers themselves they probably die on the street. The dems do nothing but pour water and fertilizer on this situation and the repubs are afraid to do anything about it for fear of being called even moreso racisss.
It will destroy this country.
Then obama and holder and crew come along and incite them into perpetrating violence and hatred on All white people, not just the assholes and we get to read about how 3 black punks beat the crap out of some white person every day in the news.
I'm up to here. I will go out of my way to not help the black community.
You're not alone. We're feeling the same thing and, if it keeps up this way, when's the breaking point for our country?
DeleteCube, I think we're at the breaking point. We have no opposition party, and we have 2 generations at least (Plus the stupid older people) who believe socialism is the way to go when there isn't a single successful example to cite.
DeleteWe may have crossed the breaking point. Many believe we have as they went silent when the POS enemy of the USA was re-elected in 2012.
test
ReplyDelete