Saturday, May 17, 2014

This Story Has libtard Written All Over It.


Ohio dad can't have more kids until he pays off child support, court says

 Click above to read the whole short absurd story.

So what happens to him if he does have more kids?  Why is he not in jail already?

What happens to the women who bring fatherless children into our world by the trainload? Nothing. We keep sending those worthless POSs more money for each new democrat voter they create. Why are they not arrested for child abuse, let alone not cut off from WIC increases?

What a bunch of nonsense. What a bunch of shit we have to see in our news pages day after day after day from failed libtard programs or libtard government that either won't deal effectively with major problems or more likely actually create the problem for their own gain.

This kind of culture can't survive.  I'm telling you.

10 comments :

  1. I'm torn on this story....on one hand, this guy simply screams for a debilitating 'accident' to befall him. On the other....mandating someones reproductive liberty is the antithesis of what we're supposed to be as a nation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CI, It's a tough issue to be sure. I think this issue would take care of itself if society throttled back it's willingness to provide for people's stupidity. ie. A single woman, or even a married woman has some number of kids who she or he and she cannot provide for results in the state taking custody of the kids because they cannot be supported in the current environment. We would find we have far fewer women producing babies because we are not paying her to do so. The problem is out of hand because we pay her to make it so. We'll always have out of control people, but imagine being a woman who has a child with no visible means of support. The child is taken and put up for adoption. How many times is some woman going to want to go through the gestation process for nothing ?

      As far as this guy, it is unclear what if any consequences would present themselves should he go and father more kids.
      It seems to me to be a swipe at a problem that is so far off target as to be laughable.

      Delete
  2. On that I agree. I think orphanages should be reintroduced, and if you can't provide a living for your offspring, they should be remanded to one. Not to mention that I fully oppose taxpayer subsidy for mothers based on the number of times that they spread their legs and became impregnated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Orphanages are much better than pedophile ran 'foster homes'. And I've heard a large number of people who grew up i orphanages testify to that back when Cincinnati had a truly disgusting death related to a young boy and a foster home'.
      In fact in this instance No One called the station and said "I had a good foster home experience". It truly was 100% for orphanage.

      I worked with women involved in the church in some of these neighborhoods who testified to me personally that these women send their kids out into the street to fend for themselves all day while they party on taxpayer dollars and breed more democrat voters. Literally...

      It's child abuse. Yet, let some mother father good home spank their kid and all hell can break loose legally right? It's upside down man, this is what libtardism brings us.

      Delete
  3. Detroit has spread to all of the Nation--Detroit-one of the first places that gave other people's $$$$ to women to have babies out of wedlock--ADC-
    Have you seen photos of Detroit - lately--
    C-CS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carol-CS. Yea, I often tell the story of a woman I saw on TV there in a 'heart warming" story near Christmas one year on the local news. 9 kids and living in a buick afer being kicked out of section 8 and one of the kids was less than a year old. She got pregnant while living in a buick with 8 kids in Detroit..... Someone bought the evil bitch a 250k house. Gee, let's wonder how that turned out.

      Delete
  4. Simple remedy. Just give him his testicles back when he starts paying support. He can wear them around his neck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sig, that works for me. In contrast, conversationally, look at what they're doing to the rest of us in order to allow this to keep happening. Not only forcing us to pay for the child and the woman's drugs and whatever, but all the ancillary stuff like prison, crime, "collateral damage".. etc.

      Delete
  5. "IF he has more kids?" Is there any question, Kid? Right?
    I am an advocate for orphanages and have been for YEARS. Actually, I'd kind of like to head one myself, now that I think of it. Truly. Yes, there are good foster families but many take the kids in for money and abuse them. We need to get our next generations out of the clutches of crack mothers and dads like the one you highlight, give them good values and build character in them. And I think it can be done.
    And yes, I believe people like this should be prevented from having children. If they want to move to another country and have more, let them. But have them and put the financial responsibility on us, and know what those poor children will be like and what a burden they will probably be on us? No way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Z, Bottom line, nothing would have any effect other than sterilization. I can accept that in such cases. Men and women.

      Delete