Mass Murder happens in gun free zones. If they weren't gun free zones, fewer mass murders would happen because essentially these people we've heard about the last 10 years are mostly cowards. It is why they go to places where they know people are not armed.
If, after 40 years of the war on drugs, you can't keep heroin away from 13 year old kids, you aren't keeping guns away from criminals and lunatics. Disarming the non-criminal/lunatic only makes the problem worse.
Police aren't they answer. They never show up until after the shooting is done.
You can't protect everyone from everything.
Arm more people. We have volunteer firemen. Why not volunteer school protection. There are many of us with CCW permits, and that is something I would do in retirement. I work days. Wouldn't take much! See some kid heading toward the school you're protecting with a weapon or tactical gear, he's not going to kill any/many people before he's dealt with.
Even if you could disarm everyone, then you got whackjobs committing mass sword mutilations at offices, schools and other sword free zones.
Come on libtards, get your head out of your ass.
I most ardently agree, Kid. Concealed carry laws would avert many of these mass murders, especially in schools where every cowardly nut job knows that the 'zero tolerance' policy on guns guarantees they will meet no resistance until police show up.
ReplyDeleteAnd any police response always takes minutes at least, and the nut job can do a lot of damage to a lot of folks in minutes.
Have a few armed school employees, and the damage, while not eliminated, is mitigated. Going forward, nut jobs will know that schools aren't the easy pickin's in days gone by...
But that will take quite a few more of these massacres before libtards pull their heads out of their asses.
Fredd, Thanks, Agree all your points of course. Geeez, if only the libs would pull their heads out. I don't see it happening though. It's going to take a Lot more. Too much more.
DeleteThe most powerful weapon in the history of man is the-
ReplyDelete"Power Of Suggestion", now in these times, with the help of Psychologist Drugs.
That is the results of Columbine.
Attack the Libs power and money source and this is what happens---retaliation.
Columbine was right after the Parental Rights Notifications Bill passed in Texas.
Now, after the Right To Work Bill passed in Mich.
If you have the time to research the other school shootings were related time wise to other Bill being purposed or Passed.
I posted this a while back and now there are several hits today for
this post.
They Say, Very interesting. I sure can't say I have any idea what motivates these people.
DeleteJust read your post They Say. That does make perfect sense.
DeleteCrass this comment may be, but think about it a minute before you reply.
ReplyDeleteWhy should there ever be more than two injured (including dead) people at one of these incidents?
Larry, Not crass at all ! That Should be the reality. Then the news reads 'Moron takes rifle to school, kills one person, gets shot by 17 students and teachers." Then it will never happen again. The morons will look for the least armed group of people and leave the schools alone.
Deleteexcept we all know that you'd be in jail for having killed a person who was carrying a toy gun, or 'didn't have plans to hurt anybody' or who was mentally ill....
DeleteDoesn't matter that he might have murdered 20 kids...we're all about protecting the guilty.
I like your idea. It's coming out now that the guy pushed himself into the school, was NOT buzzed in. If you'd been there...........
oh, but you'd be in jail for shooting an autistic person :-)
except we all know that you'd be in jail for having killed a person who was carrying a toy gun, or 'didn't have plans to hurt anybody' or who was mentally ill....
DeleteDoesn't matter that he might have murdered 20 kids...we're all about protecting the guilty.
I like your idea. It's coming out now that the guy pushed himself into the school, was NOT buzzed in. If you'd been there...........
oh, but you'd be in jail for shooting an autistic person :-)
Hi Z, Yea, we Are about protecting the guilty. Did you see where the judge (who was admonished, should have been disbarred) said that the rape must have been consensual because "it's impossible to be raped - women's bodies protect themselves from rape" and took 10 years off the perps sentence.
DeleteInteresting this starts in the 1990's for the most part and also that drugging kids in school also started about the same time. I know on the surface it's a loos connection but one that shouldn't be ignored. Thanks to They Say for bringing this up.
And No no offense taken, but it would be the rarity that anyone with a conceal carry license shoots someone with a toy gun. I know it has happened with cops though. But really, in that situation, you have a toy gun, and you know the other person has a real gun, you're going to make threatening moves against that person. You deserve to be shot. I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
PS, you'd never use a weapon until the threat was qualified of course. So, in my scenario, you'd challenge the individual, who would become a threat or walk away, or he'd already be firing shots.
DeleteBut, Kid....if you shot a perp entering your home, or the school, and he had a gun, how DO you prove he intended to use it? You know the whacko liberal lawyers would be working overtime to make YOU look like a murderer in those cases.
DeleteWE know he'd probably had plans to use it, but is probably enough to a court of law?
That's the problem with nukes and Iran, too, when you think of it! Israel should hit first to protect itself, but the world will go NUTS and smack it around for having done so. See my point? Suddenly, Israel's being told to wait...meaning, essentially, "you must wait till Tel Aviv's a smoking heap before you hit Iran".
We're told you must wait till the perp pulls the trigger before shooting him to protect yourself or a classroom of kids. HOW DO YOU PROVE THE DAMAGE HE'D HAVE DONE?
I know WE can, but a court of leftwingers in overdrive to fight guns?
not so sure.
Admiral's line about the new killing fields is excellent. And so sad.
But, Kid....if you shot a perp entering your home, or the school, and he had a gun, how DO you prove he intended to use it? You know the whacko liberal lawyers would be working overtime to make YOU look like a murderer in those cases.
DeleteWE know he'd probably had plans to use it, but is probably enough to a court of law?
That's the problem with nukes and Iran, too, when you think of it! Israel should hit first to protect itself, but the world will go NUTS and smack it around for having done so. See my point? Suddenly, Israel's being told to wait...meaning, essentially, "you must wait till Tel Aviv's a smoking heap before you hit Iran".
We're told you must wait till the perp pulls the trigger before shooting him to protect yourself or a classroom of kids. HOW DO YOU PROVE THE DAMAGE HE'D HAVE DONE?
I know WE can, but a court of leftwingers in overdrive to fight guns?
not so sure.
Admiral's line about the new killing fields is excellent. And so sad.
Z, Absolutely. The first thing they teach you in CCW class is that in order to use a gun to kill someone you really need to believe your life or a life is in danger, And who would want to shoot someone just because they had a gun. Chances are they get off the first shot in a public situation. Better 1 person than 20.
DeleteIn your house though, in Ohio you are instructed to retreat as a first line of defense, but if someone is in your house and has a gun in their hand, they are not there to make cookies. There are lots of ways it could go down, but say you challenge the person, tell them to put the gun down if they life the gun to shoot, then they've made the decision. They could drop the gun, they could turn and run, or get on the floor and in any of those cases no one dies.
An armed society was a polite society.
ReplyDeleteGun free zones are the new killing fields of the gun control crowd.
Admiral, Yep, and again They Say adds a valid element for inspection. School administered psychotic drugs because shit for brains parents not able to allow a school to discipline their little baby.
ReplyDeleteSo, this is the parents fault much more than the school.
Is there any surprise this killing field was one of the most vulnerable places on Earth one might find? And why is that? Maybe THAT is the fucking problem. security guards to protect cash but no one protecting 5 to 10 year old kids?
And where were the authorities that presumably are to protect those kids when everyone else but the criminals are unarmed? Where the fuck is That question in the national debate??
WOW-that is why I love coming here- all of the commentors above are RIGHT ON!!!
ReplyDeleteAs to you final -
"Even if you could disarm everyone, then you got whackjobs committing mass sword mutilations at offices, schools and other sword free zones.
Come on libtards, get your head out of your ass"
Sadly-Kid- I do not think it is possible for them to get their heads out of their asses-they were 'trained' by the elite-government "progressives"...
C-CS
Carol-CS, did you hear just a day or so after Newtown, there was a Japanese whackjob who went to a school and did a mass knifing of students ? No guns in Japan.
DeleteAnd a report came out detailing how the crime rate for rape, robberies and burglaries is MUCH HIGHER in merry old England than the USA! Here it is
You're right, libtards are stupid lazy dumbasses. Personally, I have no hope of anything happening in America anymore that makes any sense.